Results of application
Studies of liquid bacterial fertilizers have shown unexpected results: in addition to increasing yields, these preparations have the ability to block the penetration of radionuclides into the soil. It is especially important because the return of contaminated land to agricultural activity is of national importance.
Our micro fertilizers allow to increase the yield productivity by 15-35% and decrease the application rates of mineral fertilizers. Goods grown with the help of biotechnologies have a higher environmental quality and competitive advantages; they are enriched with vitamins and useful trace elements, and the level of nitrates in them is reduced by 2-2,5 times. When and how these fertilizers were applied is shown in the charts below.
Moreover, our products increase biological activity of soil, improve its agrotechnical and environmental characteristics, accelerate the accumulation of humus, decomposition of pesticides, herbicides and other toxic chemicals.
The influence of biological products on agricultural yield
The tables below show data on crop productivity before applying a dose of bacterial fertilizers (Control) and data on yield after applying biofertilizers for different types of crops.
The research is carried out on field experiments.
APC №1. The experiment was conducted for sugar beet on a 10 hectares area. Gray forest soil with 20-30% of clay. Introduction of biofertilizers and sowing of sugar beet was on May 11. Predecessor – winter wheat.
*APC – Agricultural Production Complex
APC №1 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Sugar beet | |||
№ var | Content | Yield CWT/ha |
Deviation from control (from var 1) |
1 | Control | 140 | 0 |
2 | Ecophyte | 170 | 30,0 |
3 | Bactophosphine | 160 | 20,0 |
4 | Ecophyte + Bactophosphine | 191 | 51,0 |
APC №2. The experiment studied the introduction of biofertilizers on buckwheat crops. 20 hectares area. Gray forest soil with 20-30% of clay
APC №2 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Buckwheat | |||
№ var |
Content |
Yield CWT/ha |
Deviation from control (from var 1) |
1 |
Control |
4,5 |
0 |
2 |
Bactophosphine |
7,5 |
3,0 |
3 |
Ecophyte |
7,7 |
3,2 |
APC №3.The experiment was based on barley, buckwheat and lupine. Introduction of biofertilizers and processing of seeds was on May 12,13, 2006. Gray forest soil with 20-30% of clay.
APC №3 | |||
---|---|---|---|
№ var | Content | Yield CWT/ha | Deviation from control (from var 1)) |
Lupine | |||
1 | Control | 15,5 | 0 |
2 | Ecophyte + Bactophosphine | 21,5 | 6,0 |
Barley | |||
1 | Control | 22,5 | 0 |
2 | Ecophyte + Bactophosphine | 28,0 | 5,5 |
Buckwheat | |||
1 | Control | 6,0 | 0 |
2 | Ecophyte + Bactophosphine | 9,0 | 3,0 |
APC №4. The experiment was held in 2005 on sugar beet. In 2006 the effect of biofertilizers was studied on spring wheat crops. The size of plot was 7,2 ha. All in all, 4 plots of land with a total area of 29 ha. Gray forest soil with 20-30% of clay. .
APC №4 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spring wheat | |||
№ var |
Content |
Yield CWT/ha |
Deviation from control (from var 1) |
1 |
Control |
21,0 |
0 |
2 |
Ecophyte |
28,0 |
7,0 |
3 |
Bactophosphine |
28,5 |
7,5 |
4 |
Ecophyte + Bactophosphine |
27,0 |
6,0 |
APC №5. Production experience. The studied crop is spring wheat. The plot area is 0,42 ha. 4 plots of land in total on 1,68 ha area. Gray forest soil with 20-30% of clay.
APC №5 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Spring wheat | |||
№ var |
Content |
Yield CWT/ha |
Deviation from control (from var 1)) |
1 |
Control |
20,0 |
0 |
2 |
Bactophosphine |
26,0 |
6,0 |
3 |
Ecophyte |
24,5 |
4,5 |
4 |
Ecophyte + Bactophosphine |
27,2 |
7,2 |
APC №6. Production experience. The crop is lupine with oats (silage). The plot area is 1 ha. 4 plots of land in total on 4 ha area. Sod-podzolic soil with 20-30% of clay.
APC №7 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Lupine with oats (green mass) | |||
№ var |
Content |
Yield CWT/ha |
Deviation from control (from var 1) |
1 |
Control |
190 |
0 |
2 |
Bactophosphine |
240 |
50 |
3 |
Ecophyte |
270 |
80 |
4 |
Ecophyte + Bactophosphine |
285 |
95 |
The effect of the complex Ecophyte+Bactophosphine is superior to those results where Ecophyte and Bactophosphine were used separately.
APC №7. Field experience. Small plots of land. Crop – potatoes. The plot area is 0,2 ha, two variations. Sod-podzolic soil with 20-30% of clay.
APC №7 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Potatoes | |||
№ var |
Content |
Yield CWT/ha |
Deviation from control (from var 1) |
1 |
Control |
180 |
0 |
2 |
Ecophyte |
210 |
30 |
APC №8. Production experience. Crop – cabbage. The plot area is 0,75 ha. 2 plots of land in total on 1,5 ha area. Gray forest soil with 20-30% of clay.
APC №8 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Cabbage | |||
№ var |
Content |
Yield CWT/ha |
Deviation from control (from var 1) |
1 |
Control |
250 |
0 |
2 |
Ecophyte |
270 |
20 |
APC №9. Production experience. Crop – cabbage. The plot area is 0,4 ha. 2 plots of land in total. Gray forest soil with 20-30% of clay.
APC №9 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Cabbage | |||
№ var |
Content |
Yield CWT/ha |
Deviation from control (from var 1) |
1 |
Control |
280 |
0 |
2 |
Ecophyte |
300 |
20 |
Studies have shown that the productivity of all cultivated agricultural crops is significantly higher in the lines with variations than in the line Control. A particularly high yield increase was in the experiments with sugar beet – 51 CWT/ha in APC №1 and lupine with oats (green mass) – 95 CWT/ha in APC №6.
The effectiveness of Ecophyte for various crops.
Crop |
Crop increase |
Where the result was obtained | |
---|---|---|---|
CWT/ha |
% | ||
Cucumbers (open ground) |
17,0 |
38 |
State Farm “Rogachevsy”, Dmitrov district, Moscow region |
Tomatoes (open ground)) |
50,0 |
18,0 |
Astrakhan region |
Rice (sort “Spalchik”) |
10,5 |
32,0 |
Krasnodar, Research Institute of Rice |
Potatoes |
43,6 |
28,0 |
Volgograd, Research Institute of Irrigated Agriculture |
Corn |
103,0 |
26,0 |
Astrakhan region, State Farm “Kucherganovsky” |
Beetroot |
82,0 |
15,0 |
Experimental Station TSHA |
Potatoes (*) |
35,0 |
24,8 |
Turgay region, State Farm «Yesilsky» |
Cotton plant |
3,0 |
11,0 |
Research Institute of Cotton Breeding and Seed Production, Uzbekistan |
Castor bean |
2,7 |
20,0 |
SPA “Elite”, Nikolaev |
Cabbage |
15,1 |
29,7 |
State Farm “Chernoyarskoye”, Pavlodar |
(*) – the nitrate content when treated with “Azotovit” is 29,2 mg/kg and without – 114 mg/kg, which means that application of “Azotovit” reduces the amount of nitrates by 3,9 times.
The data was taken from the report of the Federal State Institution “Center of chemicalization and agricultural radiology “Bryansky”, Bryansk. The head of the research work is the director of FSI “Bryanskagrochim-radiology”, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences P.V. Prudnikov.